The Past

CRIT1



In the crit today we presented our work to the group and described the brief that we were doing. This was the first crit so there was not too much structure to the feedback given for each person. 

I presented my progression with the ‘DRIP’ brief, which included, a description of the brief, some stills of the film, some influences and design direction slides and some of the design that had developed over the last couple of weeks. 

The feedback was generally good, and it seemed that there was not much to say about the brief that I had done, other than I was on the right lines. 


How can I get better feedback? 

In the next crit I hope to ask some questions that will encourage some more informative feedback. I think the problem with what I had shown today was that it was too polished. In future I feel I should go in with design sheets and rougher sketches, in order to for the designs to invite more feedback. Perhaps if something looks too finished, the crit group feel too harsh to actually crit the work. While I think we should be beyond that now, I think it is easier and more accessible to crit design that is in development as it invites feedback and ways it can be improved and developed. 

DRIP_RESEARCH/CONTEXT



What did I do?

I tried to implement a range of research methods into this brief. I found it difficult in second year to research akin to how we had learnt to in the first year. I want to place a greater focus on research in my third year briefs so I tried to cover a lot of ground with this first brief. 

I started to do some gathering of sources for typographic style and design direction. I did this to see how typography had been applied and how it had been constructed. I evaluated their similarities and differences and how this affected the overall impression of the film. 

I looked further into children’s handwriting, as this would be a theme that would run throughout the design process. I looked into how children construct their letterforms, and I was able to locate some primary research from a young boy similar to the age of the boy in the film. 


What could I have done to push it further?

To push the research further, I could have got a greater number of samples from a variety of different children to compare them. I could have perhaps volunteered as a social worker for the day at a institution for neglected children, or I could have acquired handwriting samples from children in underprivileged areas. While these would have gained some interesting pieces of primary research, there are some boundaries with these things, that would have perhaps been a little too far for the the extent of this brief. 

GOOGLECALENDAR



Joel and I collectively put the briefs on a Google Calendar in order to plan our time. So far the time planning has gone well, and keeping a strict rota seems to work in order to keep track of briefs. I have a couple of worries about how many briefs we have on the go, and the fact that my mind is constantly shifting from one thing to the next. 

I checked out some articles about multitasking to see if what I was feeling was backed up by any research found by other people.

Source:

http://psychology.about.com/od/cognitivepsychology/a/costs-of-multitasking.htm

Quick Overview:
Multitasking can reduce productivity by approximately 40-percent according to some researchers.

Switching from one task to another makes it difficult to tune out distractions and can cause mental blocks that can slow down your progress.

Take a moment and think about all of the things you are doing right now - obviously you are reading this article, but chances are good that you are also doing several things at once. Perhaps you're also listening to music, texting a friend, checking your email in another browser tab or playing a computer game.

If you are doing several different things at once, then you may be what researchers refer to as a "heavy multitasker." And you probably think that you are fairly good at this balancing act. According to a number of different studies, however, you are probably not as effective at multitasking as you think you are.

In the past, many people believed that multitasking was a good way to increase productivity. After all, if you're working on several different tasks at once, you're bound to accomplish more, right? Recent research, however, has demonstrated that that switching from one task to the next takes a serious toll on productivity. Multitaskers have more trouble tuning out distractions than people who focus on one task at a time. Also, doing so many different things at once can actually impair cognitive ability.
What the Research on Multitasking Suggests

First, let's start by defining what we mean when we use the term multitasking. It can mean performing two or more tasks simultaneously, or it can also involve switching back and forth from one thing to another. Multitasking can also involve performing a number of tasks in rapid succession.

In order to determine the impact of multitasking, psychologists asked study participants to switch tasks and then measured how much time was lost by switching. In one study conducted by Robert Rogers and Stephen Monsell, participants were slower when they had to switch tasks than when they repeated the same task.1

Another study conducted in 2001 by Joshua Rubinstein, Jeffrey Evans and David Meyer found that participants lost significant amounts of time as they switched between multiple tasks and lost even more time as the tasks became increasingly complex.2

Understanding What the Multitasking Research Means

In the brain, multitasking is managed by what are known as mental executive functions. These executive functions control and manage other cognitive processes and determine how, when and in what order certain tasks are performed. According to researchers Meyer, Evans and Rubinstein, there are two stages to the executive control process. The first stage is known as "goal shifting" (deciding to do one thing instead of another) and the second is known as "role activation" (changing from the rules for the previous task to rules for the new task).

Switching between these may only add a time cost of just a few tenths of a second, but this can start to add up when people begin switching back and forth repeatedly. This might not be that big of a deal in some cases, such as when you are folding laundry and watching television at the same time. However, if you are in a situation where safety or productivity are important, such as when you are driving a car in heavy traffic, even small amounts of time can prove critical.
Practical Applications for Multitasking Research

Meyer suggests that productivity can be reduced by as much as 40 percent by the mental blocks created when people switch tasks. Now that you understand the potential detrimental impact of multitasking, you can put this knowledge to work to increase your productivity and efficiency.

Of course, the situation plays an important role. The costs of switching tasks while texting a friend and watching a football game probably are not going to cause any major problems. However, that fraction of a second it takes to change tasks could mean life or death for someone driving down the interstate while trying to find a good radio station or talking on the phone.

The next time you find yourself multitasking when you are trying to be productive, take a quick assessment of the various things you are trying to accomplish. Eliminate distractions and try to focus on one task at a time.

References

1Rogers, R. & Monsell, S. (1995). The costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.

2Rubinstein, Joshua S.; Meyer, David E.; Evans, Jeffrey E. (2001). Executive Control of Cognitive Processes in Task Switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(4), 763-797.

Multitasking May Not Mean Higher Productivity. (2009). Talk of the Nation, National Public Radio. Found online at http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=112334449



American Psychological Association. (2006). Multitasking: Switching costs. Found online at http://apa.org/research/action/multitask.aspx

DRIP_BRIEF


Live Brief:
For Director Mark Trifunovic

This is the first brief that I will be taking on this year. I want a lot of my briefs this year to be live briefs as I feel this is what has been missing from my University experience thus far. Last year there were some projects that had a real world context, and I really enjoyed working on these. Working with real people really puts some of the things that I have been learning into context, and brings to light that there is a whole lot more for me to learn. I hope that by taking on more live briefs, I will increase the speed at which I learn new things, and be pushed out of my comfort zone a lot more. 

This brief is for a film. I had a meeting with the director in order to set the brief, which has been documented in my brief development PDF, and this was a really good insight into how I should conduct myself professionally in a meeting. While there is no pay being involved, I wanted to conduct the brief as professionally as possible in order to practice the way I carry myself, and communicate with people I am working with in a professional capacity. 

 

Copyright 2010. All rights reserved.

RSS Feed. This blog is proudly powered by Blogger and uses Modern Clix, a theme by Rodrigo Galindez. Modern Clix blogger template by Introblogger.